Fifth Circuit Court Blocks Corporate Transparency Act Enforcement Again

Other News, Politics
Reading Time: 3 minutes

INTERVIEW ON THE PRICE OF BUSINESS SHOW, MEDIA PARTNER OF THIS SITE.

Recently Kevin Price, Host of the nationally syndicated Price of Business Show, interviewed Alexander Paykin.

The Alexander Paykin Commentaries

A nationwide injunction against the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) has been reinstated by a panel from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. This reversal comes only three days after another panel of the same court lifted the previous injunction, leaving corporate compliance teams across the United States in a state of uncertainty.

The CTA, aimed at combating money laundering and enhancing financial transparency, mandates that U.S. entities formed before 2024 disclose their “beneficial owners”—those who ultimately own or control a business—by January 1, 2025. These disclosure requirements, though intended to promote accountability, have raised concerns about the burden they place on small businesses, particularly due to the need to report sensitive personal information.

The dispute originated from a lawsuit filed by Texas Top Cop Shop Inc., a firearm retailer, with legal support from the nonprofit advocacy group Center for Individual Rights (CIR). In early December, a district court issued a nationwide injunction, citing constitutional concerns with the CTA. However, on December 23, a Fifth Circuit panel lifted the injunction, suggesting the government had a strong case for defending the law’s constitutionality.

This decision was short-lived. On December 26, a different panel from the Fifth Circuit, tasked with addressing the case’s merits, reinstated the nationwide injunction. The court’s order underscored the importance of maintaining the “constitutional status quo” while deliberating the legal arguments.

Implications for Small Businesses

The reinstatement of the injunction represents a significant victory for critics of the CTA, especially small businesses concerned about the law’s reporting requirements. Rob Smith, Senior Attorney for the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), expressed relief at the decision: “This ruling brings much-needed clarity to small businesses that were left scrambling earlier this week. The court’s acknowledgment of the serious constitutional issues posed by the CTA is a step in the right direction.”

Small businesses now have temporary relief from the reporting obligations, at least until the Fifth Circuit reaches a final decision on the government’s appeal. Earlier this month, the Eastern District of Texas had issued a preliminary injunction at NFIB’s request, which was briefly overturned before being reinstated by the latest ruling.

Next Steps

The ongoing case, Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (5th Cir., No. 24-40792), continues to draw attention from businesses, legal experts, and policymakers. As the Fifth Circuit examines the constitutional issues tied to the CTA, stakeholders across the board are closely monitoring developments.

For now, the nationwide injunction remains active, temporarily halting the enforcement of the CTA’s beneficial ownership disclosure requirements. This pause offers some respite to businesses as they await the court’s final decision.

Conclusion

The reinstatement of the injunction adds another chapter to the ongoing debate over corporate transparency and compliance. As legal challenges to the CTA unfold, the law’s implications for businesses and its constitutionality remain under intense scrutiny. In the meantime, the decision provides a momentary reprieve for those grappling with the far-reaching effects of the CTA’s requirements.

 

 

Alexander Paykin, Esq., Managing Director of The Law Office of Alexander Paykin, P.C., based out of New York, focused his practice in real estate and commercial litigation and complex transactions. His firm also provides technology and finance consultancy services to its clients, including other law firms throughout the US.  With a background spanning multiple countries and businesses in finance and IT, Paykin brings a unique perspective to his legal practice.  His firm is modeled as a high-tech, client-centered practice, focusing on efficient service delivery in litigation and complex transactions related to business, commerce, finance, and real estate. He also operates a real estate brokerage and a real estate holding company.  Mr. Paykin regularly teaches continuing legal education courses and has been published in prestigious legal journals. His writings cover topics such as mutual insurer demutualization, the business judgment rule, law practice management, and the use of artificial intelligence in modern law practice.
Mr. Paykin sits on multiple professional committees and the boards of three 501c3 non-profits, as well as a condominium board.
Connect with Alexander Paykin on social media:
Twitter/X: @Paykinlaw

Share This:

Leave a Reply


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.